Sunday, July 18, 2010
Posted Sunday, July 18, 2010 by Greg
I'll be back as soon as possible with more, including the conclusion of my "Jim Wallis" series. But likely not this week, due to the opportunity to spend quality time with family.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Posted Friday, June 11, 2010 by Greg
Those involved in it are just too intent on governing. From The Washington Times:
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) leaders are attempting to distance themselves from controversial proposals published in a May 24 working paper on “reinventing” the media. The report presents a suite of options through which government could step in and supposedly rescue journalism, most notably by imposing taxes. A fee could be levied on websites such as the Drudge Report that link to the best news of the day, or a tax could be imposed on consumer electronics such as iPads, laptops and Kindles. Funds collected would be redistributed to traditional media outlets.
And they are quite fine with lying about it … (of course we shouldn’t really use the word “lie” concerning such polite company, it is really frowned upon and is very upsetting to them.)
FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz torpedoed the device tax in testimony Wednesday before a Senate Judiciary subcommittee, saying, “I think that's a terrible idea.”
… Passing the buck is a classic bureaucratic dodge. The FTC claims that the well-developed proposals released last month were simply an enumeration of options suggested in “public comments.” In fact, the agency's Federal Register announcement for the proceeding questioned the propriety of news-aggregator websites that “do not pay for content” – this document was filed long before public hearings were held.
The report's views also happen to match positions Mr. Leibowitz has held in the past. Before joining the FTC, he was vice president of the Motion Picture Association of America, an organization that defends an extreme view of copyright law in order to prop up Hollywood's increasingly obsolete business model. At a December workshop, Mr. Leibowitz complained that online news readers get a “free ride instead of paying the full value – or in fact paying anything – for what they're consuming.”
… and they don’t understand freedom … and they think they can regularly “reinvent” our lives … and they don’t understand the market … and they believe they have an almighty hand, through which they can save the world … and they believe in the (supposed) goodness of taxes and redistribution … and …
Posted by Greg
Today I changed the name of the blog from “The Holy Cause” to “Our Holy Cause.” This was done for the simple and logical reason that it matches the URL; the thrust of the blog is unchanged.
Posted by Greg
This is part 3 of a multi-part series addressing the concerns Jim Wallis recently expressed regarding libertarianism. Part 1 was largely introductory, and Part 2 considered the first of the “shortcomings” in libertarianism as declared by Rev. Wallis. In this article we will be considering the second of the five “shortcomings” to determine whether it stands up to the tests of truth, historical evidence, and scriptures.
As in the previous, unless stated otherwise, all indented text in this articles is a quote from Wallis, and all other text is mine. Here is the complete text from Rev. Wallis’ second point:
2. An anti-government ideology just isn't biblical. In Romans 13, the apostle Paul (not the Kentucky Senate candidate) describes the role and vocation of government; in addition to the church, government also plays a role in God's plan and purposes. Preserving the social order, punishing evil and rewarding good, and protecting the common good are all prescribed; we are even instructed to pay taxes for those purposes! Sorry, Tea Party. Of course, debating the size and role of government is always a fair and good discussion, and most of us would prefer smart and effective to "big" or "small" government.
Revelation 13 depicts the state as a totalitarian beast – a metaphor for Rome, which was persecuting the Christians. This passage serves as a clear warning about the abuse of governmental power. But a power-hungry government is clearly an aberration and violation of the proper role of government in protecting its citizens and upholding the demands of fairness and justice. To disparage government per se – to see government as the central problem in society – is simply not a biblical position.
It is my contention is that Wallis has made several significant errors in the above text, including the following:
- Misrepresentation of libertarians as universally anti-government – part 1
- A limited and pro-state understanding of Romans 13
- An overly rosy view of government
- Misrepresentation of libertarians as universally anti-government – part 2
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Posted Tuesday, June 8, 2010 by Greg
I am not actually recommending the book, “The Cult of the Presidency”, as I haven’t read it yet. What I am recommending though, is that you get an electronic copy while it is still online at Cato for free. And, yes, it is the updated version!
Sunday, June 6, 2010
Posted Sunday, June 6, 2010 by Greg
You know, I actually believed that Obama was going to be more peaceful than President Bush was. Silly me. Of course we knew the error of this thinking fairly quickly after he took office.
Anyway, here is the latest from the Washington Post:
Beneath its commitment to soft-spoken diplomacy and beyond the combat zones of Afghanistan and Iraq, the Obama administration has significantly expanded a largely secret U.S. war against al-Qaeda and other radical groups, according to senior military and administration officials.
Special Operations forces have grown both in number and budget, and are deployed in 75 countries, compared with about 60 at the beginning of last year. In addition to units that have spent years in the Philippines and Colombia, teams are operating in Yemen and elsewhere in the Middle East, Africa and Central Asia.
…. One advantage of using "secret" forces for such missions is that they rarely discuss their operations in public. For a Democratic president such as Obama, who is criticized from either side of the political spectrum for too much or too little aggression, the unacknowledged CIA drone attacks in Pakistan, along with unilateral U.S. raids in Somalia and joint operations in Yemen, provide politically useful tools. bookkeeping services hornsby
Obama, one senior military official said, has allowed "things that the previous administration did not."
…. The Obama administration has rejected the constitutional executive authority claimed by Bush and has based its lethal operations on the authority Congress gave the president in 2001 to use "all necessary and appropriate force against those nations, organizations, or persons" he determines "planned, authorized, committed, or aided" the Sept. 11 attacks.
Many of those currently being targeted, Bellinger said, "particularly in places outside Afghanistan," had nothing to do with the 2001 attacks.
Read the whole thing here.
Live free, regardless.
- ► June (8)
- Memorial Day Video
- Recommended: Would Jesus Celebrate Memorial Day?
- Jim Wallis on libertarianism
- An Example of Free Action Working
- Classic Reprint: What Samuel Said About Solomon
- Rationing of Healthcare is the Little Problem
- Classic Reprint: Live a New Kind of Life
- Priming the Comments – What do you think?
- Advertising at The Holy Cause
- Gary North: The 1099 Tsunami
- Classic Reprint: Riddle You This
- homes for sale tucson
- Thankfully Obama Was Very Specific With His (Broke...
- Ron Paul – Judged by a Higher Standard
- Walter Williams on Drugs, Economics, and Liberty
- Self-Ownership is Self-Evident
- Classic Reprint: Peace on Earth
- Is Blogging “Creative” Enough to Quit Working?
- A Story of “End the Fed”
- Another Foreign Entanglement
- Your Papers Please
- Thoughts on Freedom and Liberty
- Sharpening Our Presentation of the Message of Free...
- Swimming in Red Ink
- The Folly of Trusting Local Government
- Neither Left nor Right, but Certainly Correct
- Updated Christian libertarian Blog Listing
- ► November (6)